This War Studies Advanced Program will introduce students to some major intellectual discussions underpinning the Salafi-jihadist ideology of al Qaeda and ISIS, while exploring the differences between the two groups as of December 2016. For this Advanced Session, the faculty will divide the students into sections (circulated on Monday morning at the all-hands introductory lecture) in order to ensure that students can participate actively in guided, seminar-style discussions. Each group will be responsible for writing a series of position papers and briefing them on Friday. The faculty will give paper assignments at intervals through the course. Each group must use its time out of the seminar to discuss and prepare the position papers.

Questions for consideration throughout the course:

  • What constitutes the Muslim community?
  • What constitutes apostasy?
  • Who decides who is a believer?
  • How can a human know if someone is really a believer or is a hypocrite or apostate?
  • What kind of government is legitimate, and why?
  • What kind of government is illegitimate, and why?
  • What actions are permitted to Muslims living under illegitimate governments?
  • Is worldly success a sign of divine approval?
  • When is it right for humans to punish sins against Allah, and when should the punishment be left for Allah?

War Studies Advanced Programs are open only to alumni of the basic War Studies course. These sessions are offered in the winter and summer, and focus either on a national security challenge or on a historical conflict. Learn more about the War Studies Program.

 

General John Allen on the military campaign against ISIS

Faculty

John R. Allen

John R. Allen is President of the Brookings Institution and a retired U.S. Marine Corps four-star general. He previously served as commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan and special presidential envoy to the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL.

James M. Dubik

LTG James M. Dubik (U.S. Army, Ret.) is a Senior Fellow at the Institute for the Study of War and a Professor at Georgetown University’s Security Studies Program. General Dubik has extensive operational experience in Iraq, Afghanistan, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Bosnia, Haiti, Panama, and in many NATO countries.

Frederick W. Kagan

Frederick W. Kagan is a Senior Instructor with the Hertog War Studies Program at the Institute for the Study of War. The author of the 2007 report “Choosing Victory: A Plan for Success in Iraq,” he is one of the intellectual architects of the successful “surge” strategy in Iraq. He is the director of AEI’s Critical Threats Project.

Kimberly Kagan

Kimberly Kagan is a Senior Instructor with the Hertog War Studies Program and founder and president of the Institute for the Study of War. She is a military historian who has taught at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, Yale, Georgetown, and American University.

Preview the Syllabus by Week/Session

Some Specialized Vocabulary used throughout the Course:

  • Allah—we will refer to the God presented in the Qu’ran, hadith, and all discussions of Islam as Allah, recognizing that by those writings He is the same as the God of the Hebrew Bible and New Testament.
  • Hadith—the sayings and deeds of the Prophet that serve as guides for right behavior for Muslims
  • Qu’ran—literally “recitation,” the word of Allah revealed to Muhammad orally and presented orally by Muhammad to his community. It was not written down completely for many years after Muhammad’s death. In its current form, it is arranged in chapters (suras) by length from longest to shortest, except for the first sura, which is the statement of the creed of Islam
  • Islam—submission (to Allah)
  • Muslim—one who submits (to Allah)
  • Umma—the Muslim community, those who believe in Allah
  • Ulema—religious scholars (singular: ‘Alim)
  • Jahiliya—the period of ignorance of Allah’s word before Allah revealed it to Muhammad (Qutb will modify this meaning somewhat)
  • Tawhid—the unity of Allah (it means “unity”, but in the religious context it usually means monotheism or the worshipping of Allah alone without any divine partners)
  • Shirk—apostasy, turning away from Allah
  • Ikhwan—the Brotherhood, short for Muslim Brotherhood
  • Takfir—the act of declaring another Muslim an unbeliever (kufr); it is an accusation of apostasy
  • Fitna—conflict within the Umma
  • Ansar—those who accompanied and supported Muhammad
  • Sunna—the way of the Prophet (orthodoxy—those who are orthodox are, thus, Sunni)
  • Shi’a—short for “shi’at ‘Ali,” or the party of ‘Ali; supporters of the claims of the descendants of the fourth Caliph, ‘Ali, to the Caliphate as opposed to the Sunni Caliphs.
  • La ilaha illa Allah—the central statement of the Muslim creed, meaning “there is no deity but Allah”

 

Readings:

  • Marshall Hodgson, The Venture of Islam, Volume I
    • Offers a good, if detailed, overview of the origins and development of Islam, Mohammad’s role, and the evolution of the Muslim polity after Mohammad’s death. It includes a lengthy and interesting section on Arabia before Mohammad, which you can skip for purposes of this course. If you are totally unfamiliar with Islam, its history, and its traditions, or with the historical figure of Mohammad and the history of the early Muslim polity, it’s worth reading Chapters 2 and 3, especially starting with the section entitled “The Meccan System.”
  • G. R. Hawting, The First Dynasty of Islam, Chapter 2: “Rise of the Umayyads and the Kharijites”
    • The history of the first four Caliphs (Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman, and Ali) is vitally important to Islam. Known as the rashidan, or the period of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, this era is significant because it is the only period in Islam when there was a unified Muslim community (Ummah), not riven by any sort of sectarianism. When people say that the Salafi-jihadis want to return the world to the 7th Century (which is largely untrue), this is what they actually mean. For our purposes, the history of the Kharijites is particularly important. The Kharijites are almost universally regarded as heretics within Islam, and Salafi-jihadis take it very hard when they are compared with Kharijites. We will nevertheless consider the degree to which current Salafi-jihadi ideology is or is not an intellectual descendent of Kharajitism. For those of you wondering about it, this chapter will also explain the crux of the schism between Shi’ism and Sunnism.
  • Qu’ran, suras (chapters) 1 (introduction), 2 (the cow), 4 (women), and 7 (the heights)
    • Islam is governed by a number of texts and practices. The Qu’ran is, of course, the most important. Muslims believe that it is the literal word of God narrated to Mohammad, his Prophet.  We read sections of the Qu’ran in Lesson One, but it is, for the most part, relatively less important for our study than the hadith that we will read in Lesson 2.
  • Genesis 11:27- 25:11, (Abraham), from The New Oxford Annotated Bible with Apocrypha, Revised Edition

Readings:

  • Abdullah Saeed, “The official ulema and religious legitimacy of the modern nation state” in Shahram Akbarzadeh and Abdullah Saeed, Islam and Political Legitimacy, Chapter 2
  • Sahih Bukhari, Hadith, Books 2, 84, and 89. “Belief”
    • The hadith are the sayings and actions of Mohammad, whose speech and behavior were (and are) regarded as divinely-guided and therefore suitable for emulation by the faithful. Muslims from earliest times recognized both the importance and the difficulty of ensuring that hadith are reported accurately, and so an extensive and intricate system was developed to authenticate them. That is why each one begins with a description of who heard or witnessed it (reproduced in this translation), and also the precise chain of transmission from that witness to the compiler. There are many apocryphal hadith, and Salafi-jihadis often rely on them for some of the more extreme rulings. Note that Shi’a have their own hadith derived from the sayings and actions of Ali bin abi Talib, the fourth Caliph and the first Shi’a Imam. Bukhari is one of the most important and respected compilers of hadith. It is worth reading the examples he brings to bear of the definition of faith and belief in order to compare this orthodox and widely-held view with the much more esoteric notions held by Salafi-jihadis. It is also a good idea to familiarize yourself with the manner in which hadith are narrated in order to understand the mannerisms that suffuse Salafi-jihadi writings and the feasibility of inserting apocryphal hadith among populations lacking highly-educated theologians.

Readings:

  • Ibn Taymiyyah, Enjoining Right and Forbidding Wrong
    • Try to read or at least skim the whole thing. Focus on both the imperatives and on the modifications and qualifiers to the imperatives—should the righteous Muslim always forbid wrong and enjoin right? Are there restrictions to the methods, means, or times for doing so? Salafi-jihadis rely heavily on ibn Taymiyyah for a variety of rulings. But they read him very selectively.
  • Muhammad bin Abdul-Wahhab, Kitab at-Tauhid, Chapters 1-6
    • The originator of Wahhabism, Wahhab engages in an interesting effort to interpret right behavior by engaging heavily with hadith. The principle that interpreting the Qu’ran is impermissible was well-established by Wahhab’s time, but hadith is fair game for interpretation, and that is his focus. Note especially what he says about the significance of the creed— la ilaha illa Allah — for recognizing a righteous Muslim, as well as his manner of argumentation and interpretation.

Sayyed Qutb

Readings:

 

al Qaeda

Readings:

Background

Readings:

 

ISIS

Readings:

 

Jabhat al Nusra

Readings:

Other Courses You Might Be Interested In

The Challenges of the Middle East

Understand the Arab Spring and how, together with its aftermath, it has changed American priorities and strategies.

The War in Iraq: A Study in Decision-Making

Examine key strategic decisions during one of the most dynamic confrontations of the late 20th and early 21st centuries: the U.S. and Iraq.

Lessons of the Iraq War

Examine how the United States grappled with the challenges presented by Iraq.

The Iranian Challenge

Consider the strategic options for dealing with Iran’s nuclear program.