In the final week of Political Studies, fellows will return to the question of statesmanship, what elevates it above ordinary political leadership, and separates it from tyranny.

The first section will focus on Thucydides’ masterpiece, The Peloponnesian War, and examine a series of strategic challenges and responses to them. The second section will consider the nature of ideological tyranny through the writings of thinkers like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Hannah Arendt, and Václav Havel.

Image: Ivy Close Images / Alamy Stock Photo

Flagg Taylor on the Gulag

Faculty

Flagg Taylor

Flagg Taylor is an Associate Professor of Government at Skidmore College, and serves on the Academic Council of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation. He is editor most recently of The Long Night of the Watchman: Essays by Václav Benda, 1977–1989. He is currently writing a book on Czech dissent in the 1970s and 1980s and hosts The Enduring Interest podcast.

Jakub J. Grygiel

Jakub Grygiel is an Associate Professor at the Catholic University of America. From 2017–18, he was a member of the Policy Planning Staff at the U.S. Department of State. His most recent book is Return of the Barbarians: Confronting Non-State Actors from Ancient Rome to the Present.

Preview the Syllabus by Week/Session

Readings:

 

Discussion Questions:

  1. Great powers fear “entrapment” (being dragged into small and peripheral wars by their allies) while their allies fear “abandonment” (being left alone by their distant security patron). How can these fears be mitigated? Do they reflect the reality of international politics?
  2. What is the importance of allies for the U.S.?

Readings:

 

Discussion Questions:

  1. The Peloponnesian War was a conflict between a sea power (Athens) and a land power (Sparta). What are the features of such a conflict? What are the differences in how they conduct war?
  2. How did the strategy of Archidamus differ from that of Pericles?
  3. What strategy should the U.S. pursue against its continental rivals (China, Iran, Russia)?

Readings:

  • Xenophon, Hiero or the Skilled Tyrant
  • Carl Friedrich, “The Unique Character of a Totalitarian Society” (from The Great Lie)

 

Discussion Questions:

  1. What does Xenophon’s portrait of Hiero suggest about the longings of a tyrant?
  2. What does the dialogue suggest about the possibility of a reformed or stabilized tyrannical rule?
  3. According to Friedrich, what are the distinguishing characteristics of a totalitarian regime?

Readings:

  • Hannah Arendt, “Ideology and Terror: A Novel Form of Government” (from The Great Lie)
  • Alain Besançon, “On the Difficulty of Defining the Soviet Regime” (from The Great Lie)

 

Discussion Questions:

  1. What is the character of “totalitarian lawfulness” according to Arendt?
  2. Why, according to Besançon, does the Soviet regime escape the regime classification schemes of Aristotle and Montesquieu?
  3. What is the unique role that ideology plays in a totalitarian regime according to both Besançon and Arendt?

Readings:

  • Arthur Koestler, The God That Failed
  • Czeslaw Milosz, “The Pill of Murti-Bing” (from The Great Lie) and “Child of Europe” (a poem)

 

Discussion Questions:

  1. How does Koestler account for his own conversion to Communism? How does Koestler’s account compare to Milosz’s portrait of intellectuals’ attraction to Communism?
  2. What accounts for Koestler’s disenchantment with the Communist Party and his eventual departure from it?
  3. In the poem “Child of Europe,” the “we” of Section 1 ends up dispensing a certain kind of wisdom to the “child of Europe” in Sections 2–8. What is the character of that wisdom?

Readings:

  • Václav Benda, “The Parallel Polis” (from The Great Lie)
  • Václav Havel, “The Power of the Powerless” (from The Great Lie)
  • Václav Havel, Audience and Protest (2 one-act plays)

 

Discussion Questions:

  1. What is the “parallel polis,” and what is it meant to accomplish?
  2. What is the role of ideology in a post-totalitarian regime?
  3. Explain Havel’s green-grocer and the significance of this image.
  4. Who is Ferdinand Vaněk, and what effect does he have on his interlocutors in these two plays?

Readings:

  • Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, “We Have Ceased to See the Purpose” (from The Great Lie)
  • Pierre Manent, “The Return of Political Philosophy” (from The Great Lie)
  • Chantal Delsol, “Traces of a Wounded Animal” (from The Great Lie)

 

Discussion Questions:

  1. Explain Solzhenitsyn’s critique of a certain idea of progress.
  2. According to Pierre Manent, what is the relationship between totalitarianism and modern science on the one hand and modern democracy on the other?
  3. What is the broader meaning of the struggle of central European dissidents according to Chantal Delsol?

Other Courses You Might Be Interested In

Generalship: High Command in War

Examine what it means to command at the very highest levels of war with a former CENTCOM commander.

Machiavelli’s The Prince

Study the classic treatise that brought Machiavelli fame—and infamy.

Statesmanship: Plutarch & Lincoln

Examine the idea of statesmanship, through a classic text and the statecraft of Abraham Lincoln.

Great Figures: Winston Churchill

Consider the challenges of statesmanship through the words and deeds of Winston S. Churchill.